The New Zealand Open Source Society

Search

Navigation

  • About NZOSS
  • What is Open Source Software?
  • What are Open Standards?
  • Open Source Resources
  • Company supporters
  • Open Source Projects
  • Events
  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Job Listings
  • Links
  • Mailing Lists
  • search

NZOSS Company Supporter

  • Egressive Limited

    Egressive is an open source software company, specialising in web applications built on the Drupal framework and Ubuntu Linux server infrastructure and support. We provide strategic IT consulting services and assist businesses and organisations in migrating to open source infrastructure, both on the server and the desktop. We maintain a significant open source hosting infrastructure and provide managed services both in New Zealand and overseas data centres.

    Website: 
    http://egressive.com
more

New Zealand Open Source Project

  • Docvert
    Website: 
    http://docvert.org

    Docvert takes office documents and quickly turns them into standards-compliant web pages, something that most organisations struggle with everyday. Started by Matthew Holloway, Docvert has been picked up by the US-based Public Knowledge Project, which is dedicated to improving the scholarly and public quality of research. Docvert helps non-technical editors and authors put their work online, significantly increasing global access to knowledge and academic research. Docvert is also in use by a number of government agencies keen to ensure long documents are highly accessible on their websites.

more

Upcoming events

  • New Economics of IT- New Zealand Tour(10 days)
Add to iCalendar
more

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

News Feed

XML feed
Home

NZOSS Analysis of Ecma OOXML Responses

Submitted by donchristie on March 10, 2008 - 13:50.

Now that the Ballot Resolution Meeting (BRM) in Geneva is over I thought people might be interested in the analysis the NZOSS provided on Ecma's responses to Standards NZ comments. Note that last August Microsoft and Ecma promised they would "fix everything" in time for the BRM. Have a look at the document attached to this article.

As you can see from the attached document, in the lead up to the BRM Ecma offered improvements to only 13 of the 54 SNZ comments. Out of these 13 "improvements" we found only one that really did address the fundamental issue. That's right, Ecma "fixed" 1 comment out of 54.

The BRM voted the vast majority of Ecma's responses through without any discussion so other than one or two isolated cases we can assume that the pre-BRM status quo remains.

That being said, we are still trying to work on the mass of documentation that has come out of the BRM to see what material changes have been made to the proposed ISO standard. Unfortunately there will not be a revised specification to work from, instead we have to apply the results of 1027 (1Kb) responses, plus BRM discussions to the specification. This is a monumental task.

AttachmentSize
application/pdffinal-nzoss-brm-response.pdf716.58 KB
  • Login or register to post comments

All content © the NZ Open Source Society unless otherwise noted.

Powered by Drupal. |  Themed by CatalystIT |  Hosted by Egressive |  W3C standards compliant XHTML 1.0 Strict markup and CSS 2.0 styling.